Sept. 23) US judge gives EPA 6 months to decide whether regulations
needed for farmland runoff pollution
NEW ORLEANS — Environmental advocates in states along the Mississippi
River have won a round toward a long-term goal of having federal
standards created to regulate farmland runoff and other pollution
blamed for the oxygen-depleted “dead zone” in the Gulf of Mexico and
problems in other bodies of water.
In a ruling Friday, U.S. District Judge Jay Zainey in New Orleans gave
the Environmental Protection Agency six months to decide whether to
set Clean Water Act standards for nitrogen and phosphorous in all U.S.
waterways or explain why they’re not needed. The EPA describes the
nutrients on its website as “one of America’s most widespread, costly
and challenging environmental problems,” affecting every state.
“If they step up to the plate and do the right thing, agreeing to
promulgate federal standards where states have failed, the impact on
waters throughout the nation could be hugely positive,” said Ann
Alexander, an attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, one
of nine environmental groups including the Gulf Restoration Network,
the Sierra Club and the Prairie Rivers Network.
If they do, she said Monday, one of the first areas to look at could
be the 31 states of the Mississippi River basin, because the annual
dead zone is “one of the clearest manifestations of the severity of
the problem.” Every summer, nutrients feed algae blooms at the river’s
mouth. Algae and the protozoa that eat them die and fall to the
bottom, where their decomposition uses up oxygen. That creates an area
on the sea bottom averaging nearly 5,800 square miles — larger than
the state of Connecticut — where there is too little oxygen for
“More than 100,000 miles of rivers and streams, close to 2.5 million
acres of lakes, reservoirs and ponds, and more than 800 square miles
of bays and estuaries in the United States have poor water quality
because of nitrogen and phosphorus pollution,” according to EPA.
“Additionally, nutrients can soak into ground water, which provides
drinking water to millions of Americans.”
Earlier this month, a federal judge in Pennsylvania upheld federal and
state pollution limits worked out by the EPA, six states and
Washington, D.C., to improve the health of the Chesapeake Bay by more
tightly regulating wastewater treatment, construction along waterways
and agricultural runoff. The American Farm Bureau, one of 44
agricultural groups that asked to join EPA as plaintiffs in the
Louisiana lawsuit, had challenged the regulations.
Similar issues are driving the damaging algae blooms in Lake Erie and
threatening other parts of the Great Lakes, the NRDC said in a news
The environmental groups are also members of the Mississippi River
Collaborative, which asked EPA in a 2008 petition to set standards and
cleanup plans for nitrogen and phosphorus pollution of the river.
An attorney for the agricultural groups, from the U.S. Poultry & Egg
Association, the National Corn Growers Association and the National
Pork Producers Council to farm bureaus in 15 states from Louisiana to
Wyoming, said he would ask his clients if they wanted to comment.
“We’re reviewing the ruling. We have no further comment at this time,”
U.S. Department of Justice attorney Wyn Hornbuckle wrote in an email.
The department argued for EPA that setting such rules would be
unnecessarily complex, would take too many people and too much time,
and that the agency could more effectively fight water pollution by
working with states to reduce such pollution from fertilizer, sewage
and storm runoff.
States are indeed working with the EPA and each other on the problem,
said Garret Graves, coastal protection chief for Louisiana, one of 12
states that joined the EPA as defendants. “The Hypoxia Task Force is
meeting this week in Minneapolis to advance nutrient management
strategies on the entire Mississippi River basin,” he said.
He said Iowa released its plan about a year ago. “We’re working in
that larger venue to make sure that all the state efforts are
complementary,” Graves said.
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2007 ruling in a lawsuit about greenhouse
gases and car emissions also requires EPA to investigate whether
federal water pollution standards are needed, Zainey ruled Friday.
He refused to rule that such standards should be based only on
science, noting that the Clean Water Act was designed to give the
states the first crack at setting water quality standards, letting EPA
step in “only when the states demonstrate that they either cannot or
will not comply.”
“Plaintiffs contend that most states to date have done little or
nothing to meaningfully control the levels of nitrogen and phosphorous
that pollute their waters, and that they have even less political will
to protect downstream waters,” he wrote.
Alexander said the federal government has known at least since the
1990s that the nutrients are a major problem. She said EPA warned
states in 1998 that it would have to act if states didn’t set their
own standards within three years. “They extended that deadline and
then ultimately blew through it,” Alexander said.